Post-truth conceptual engineering

نویسندگان

چکیده

Conceptual engineering is the method for assessing and improving our concepts. Some have recently claimed that implementation of such in form ameliorative projects truth-driven should thus be epistemically constrained, ultimately at least (Simion, Mona. 2018b. “The ‘Should’ Engineering.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal Philosophy 61 (8): 914–928; cf. Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang. 2018. “Ideology Normativity: Constraints on Philosophy, Online first, 1–15. doi:10.1080/0020174X.2018.1562374). This paper challenges claim assumption a social constructionist analysis ideologies, provides an alternative, pragmatic cognitive framework determining legitimacy conceptual overall. The upshot one not ameliorate sake truth or knowledge, case ideologies – least, primarily.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Populism, Exclusion, Post-truth. Some Conceptual Caveats; Comment on “The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy”

In their editorial, Speed and Mannion identify two main challenges “the rise of post-truth populism” poses for health policy: the populist threat to inclusive healthcare policies, and the populist threat to well-designed health policies that draw on professional expertise and research evidence. This short comment suggests some conceptual clarifications that might help in thinking through more p...

متن کامل

“Conceptual Truth”

The paper criticizes epistemological conceptions of analytic or conceptual truth, on which assent to such truths is a necessary condition of understanding them. The critique involves no Quinean scepticism about meaning. Rather, even granted that a paradigmatic candidate for analyticity is synonymous with a logical truth, both the former and the latter can be intelligibly doubted by linguistical...

متن کامل

Conceptual Truth Defended

Since (2) and (3) entail that someone could have justified true belief but no knowledge, we may conclude that knowledge cannot be justified true belief. In much the same vein, Davidson (1987, 47) devises his swampman-scenario to convince us that historical properties are essential for meaning, and Searle (1984) intends his story of the Chinese room to make us see that understanding is not reduc...

متن کامل

Populism, Exclusion, Post-truth. Some Conceptual Caveats Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy".

In their editorial, Speed and Mannion identify two main challenges "the rise of post-truth populism" poses for health policy: the populist threat to inclusive healthcare policies, and the populist threat to well-designed health policies that draw on professional expertise and research evidence. This short comment suggests some conceptual clarifications that might help in thinking through more p...

متن کامل

Truth as Utility: A Conceptual Synthesis

This paper introduces conceptual relations tlrat syntlresizc utilitarian and logical con­ cepts, extending the logics of preference of [{escher. We define first, in the context of a possible­ worlds modeL constraint-dependent mea­ sures that quantify the relative quality of al­ temative solutions of reasoning problems or the relative desirabi lity of various policies in coutrol. decision, and p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0020-174X', '1502-3923']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2021.1887758